The Lucknow bench of the Allahabad High Court will pronounce its judgement today on the 60-year-old Ram Janam Bhoomi-Babri Masjid dispute.
New Delhi / Lucknow: Sixty years after it first went to court, there shall be a verdict in the Ayodhya title suit today afternoon. The Lucknow bench of the Allahabad High Court is expected to deliver its verdict after 3 pm.
It has been a protracted legal battle, and people across the country have spoken in one voice on the need to maintain peace and harmony irrespective of the verdict. (Watch – India united for peace: Appeals for calm)
The background to the Ayodhya dispute
Ayodhya verdict is perhaps the most awaited verdict in recent history. The Lucknow bench of the Allahabad High Court will pronounce its judgement on the 60- year-old Ayodhya title suit today. The disputed Ramjanmbhoomi-Babri mosque site has been contentious for over a hundred years now. The property dispute, or the title suit, went to court in 1949
The verdict in the Ram Janambhoomi-Babri Masjid dispute will decide whether the 2.7 acres of disputed land on which the Babri Masjid stood before it was demolished on December 6, 1992, belongs to the Sunni Central Waqf Board or to the Akhil Bharat Hindu Mahasabha.
The Ayodhya dispute at a glance; (Watch – The background to the Ayodhya dispute)
The verdict to be delivered in Lucknow today considers a dispute over 2.7 acres of land in Ayodhya.
The dispute was first taken to court 60 years ago
There are four title suits that ask the court to decide on:
- ownership of the land
- whether there was a temple at the site before 1538
- did the idols of Lord Ram, Sita and Lakshman exist inside the mosque, or were the idols placed inside on 22 December, 1949?
There was communal tension when an idol of Lord Ram was found inside in December 1949, and the government confiscated the site. That is when the lawsuits began.
The Ramjanmabhoomi Trust holds that this land is the birthplace of Lord Ram
The Waqf Board holds that the land was site of the 16th century Babri mosque
In December 1992, thousands of kar sevaks, led by BJP and RSS leaders, demolished the Babri Masjid.
The litigants involved with the four suits being considered today are the following. All these cases were originally filed in the court of the Civil Judge, Faizabad, and are now before the High Court. (Ayodhya verdict: Legal issues at stake)
Gopal Singh Visharad – case filed on January 16, 1950. Gopal Singh Visharad has since died and his son Rajendra Singh is now the litigant.
Relief claimed:
- That Hindu’s be entitled to go to visit the dispute site and worship the idols there without any checks or obstructions.
- Prohibitory orders must be issued preventing anyone from removing the idols and closing the doors of the masjid.
Nirmohi Akhada – case filed on December 17, 1959. The case was filed by the Akhada through Mahant Ragunath Das, who is now dead.
Relief claimed:
- To give the management of the disputed site to the descendents of Mahant Ragunath Das, the Mahant of the Nirmohi Akhada.
Sunni Central Board of Waqfs, UP – case filed on December 18, 1961 by the Central Board of Waqfs, UP, through secretary and nine others.
Relief claimed:
- That the disputed site must be declared as a mosque and the area adjoining as a Muslim graveyard.
- That possession be given to the central board of waqfs.
On behalf of deity Lord Ram and Deoki Nandan Agarwal – case filed on July 1, 1989. Deoki Nandan Agarwal is a senior advocate and a retired judge of the Allahabad High Court.
Relief Claimed:
- That the disputed structure belongs to the deity Lord Ram.
- Injunction against the Waqf board preventing them from interfering in the building of the temple.
- Demolishing the existing structure of the Babri Masjid. (This was filed before the demolition of the Babri mosque in 1992)
Security measures:
Across the country, it has been life as usual today, including in Faizabad and Ayodhya, where schools and colleges are also open.
The Centre and the state governments, however, are taking no chances and so security has been tightened in sensitive areas and forces have been mobilised. All political parties and religious groups associated with the dispute have said they will respect the verdict.
There is strict vigil in Faizabad. More than 20,000 securitymen are on alert and there is arrangement for aerial surveys. (Watch: Life in Lucknow, Faizabad normal) I (Mayawati: Centre didn’t give enough forces)
1,90,000 security personnel in Uttar Pradesh
19 places have been identified as “sensitive.”
Maharashtra, Kerala, Karnataka and Madhya Pradesh have been identified as trouble-prone.
Central forces would be 10 minutes away and on call with extensive deployment near sensitive spots.
India Air Force aircraft would be on standby to transport troops to eight places across the country.
Ban on bulk SMSes continues.
No pillion riders and parking not allowed near restricted sites in Delhi, Hyderabad.
The three-Judge bench comprising Justice S U Khan, Justice Sudhir Agarwal and Justice D V Sharma will deliver the verdict at 3.30 pm.
Allahabad High Court has said that the judgement of the case will be available on the official website of the court www.allahabadhighcourt.in and www.rjbm.nic.in.
The court has been turned into a virtually impregnable fortress having been declared as a no access zone.
Additional civil and police officers are being deployed at sensitive places including Allahabad High Court and its Lucknow bench premises.
Administrations in all the districts are directed to ensure that anti-social elements do not disturb law and order situation on the pretext of this sensitive issue.
Security of the three High Court judges had already been tightens. About 20 personnel of PAC and five CRPF personnel have been deployed at residence of all the three judges.
They have been also provided an escort and pilot car and one PSO. A DSP rank officer has been made in charge of the judge’s security.
About 25 districts of the state including Agra, Allahabad, Aligarh, Azamgarh, Bareilly, Beharaich, Bulandsahar, Gonda, Gorakhpur, Kanpur, Meerut, Moradabad, Mau, Varanasi, Faizabad, Mathura, Bijnore, Muzaffarnagar and Lucknow have been identified as sensitive and hyper sensitive and special precautions have taken in these districts.
On Wednesday, Home Minister P. Chidambaram said that the Centre has taken adequate measures and deployed enough security forces all over the country to assist the state governments to maintain peace.
He said that all the state governments have been advised to be firm and expressed the confidence that they will be able to maintain public order and peace.
The Supreme Court had on Tuesday gave its nod to the court’s Lucknow Bench to go ahead with its announcement of the judgment in the case, as it rejected an appeal that sought to defer the Allahabad Court’s verdict on the Ayodhya-Ramjanambhoomi title issue.
New Delhi / Lucknow: Sixty years after it first went to court, there shall be a verdict in the Ayodhya title suit today afternoon. The Lucknow bench of the Allahabad High Court is expected to deliver its verdict after 3 pm.
It has been a protracted legal battle, and people across the country have spoken in one voice on the need to maintain peace and harmony irrespective of the verdict. (Watch – India united for peace: Appeals for calm)
The verdict in the Ram Janambhoomi-Babri Masjid dispute will decide whether the 2.7 acres of disputed land on which the Babri Masjid stood before it was demolished on December 6, 1992, belongs to the Sunni Central Waqf Board or to the Akhil Bharat Hindu Mahasabha.
Tags: Ayodhya verdict, High Court, Judgement, Video, Babri Masjid, Ram Janambhoomi, dispute, 30th september, 2010,Babri Masjid Verdict , Babri Masjid Demolition Video ,Pictures,babri masjid, babri masjid demolition, babri masjid demolition video, babri masjid controversy, babri masjid demolition pictures,ayodhya controversy, ayodhya history, what is ayodhya verdict, ayodhya verdict latest news, ayodhya verdict holiday
Ayodhya verdict: Allahabad High Court judgement after 3 pm today
New Delhi / Lucknow: Sixty years after it first went to court, there shall be a verdict in the Ayodhya title suit today afternoon. The Lucknow bench of the Allahabad High Court is expected to deliver its verdict after 3 pm.
It has been a protracted legal battle, and people across the country have spoken in one voice on the need to maintain peace and harmony irrespective of the verdict. (Watch – India united for peace: Appeals for calm)
The background to the Ayodhya dispute
Ayodhya verdict is perhaps the most awaited verdict in recent history. The Lucknow bench of the Allahabad High Court will pronounce its judgement on the 60- year-old Ayodhya title suit today. The disputed Ramjanmbhoomi-Babri mosque site has been contentious for over a hundred years now. The property dispute, or the title suit, went to court in 1949
The verdict in the Ram Janambhoomi-Babri Masjid dispute will decide whether the 2.7 acres of disputed land on which the Babri Masjid stood before it was demolished on December 6, 1992, belongs to the Sunni Central Waqf Board or to the Akhil Bharat Hindu Mahasabha.
The Ayodhya dispute at a glance; (Watch – The background to the Ayodhya dispute)
The verdict to be delivered in Lucknow today considers a dispute over 2.7 acres of land in Ayodhya.
The dispute was first taken to court 60 years ago
There are four title suits that ask the court to decide on:
- ownership of the land
- whether there was a temple at the site before 1538
- did the idols of Lord Ram, Sita and Lakshman exist inside the mosque, or were the idols placed inside on 22 December, 1949?
There was communal tension when an idol of Lord Ram was found inside in December 1949, and the government confiscated the site. That is when the lawsuits began.
The Ramjanmabhoomi Trust holds that this land is the birthplace of Lord Ram
The Waqf Board holds that the land was site of the 16th century Babri mosque
In December 1992, thousands of kar sevaks, led by BJP and RSS leaders, demolished the Babri Masjid.
The litigants involved with the four suits being considered today are the following. All these cases were originally filed in the court of the Civil Judge, Faizabad, and are now before the High Court. (Ayodhya verdict: Legal issues at stake)
Gopal Singh Visharad – case filed on January 16, 1950. Gopal Singh Visharad has since died and his son Rajendra Singh is now the litigant.
Relief claimed:
- That Hindu’s be entitled to go to visit the dispute site and worship the idols there without any checks or obstructions.
- Prohibitory orders must be issued preventing anyone from removing the idols and closing the doors of the masjid.
Nirmohi Akhada – case filed on December 17, 1959. The case was filed by the Akhada through Mahant Ragunath Das, who is now dead.
Relief claimed:
- To give the management of the disputed site to the descendents of Mahant Ragunath Das, the Mahant of the Nirmohi Akhada.
Sunni Central Board of Waqfs, UP – case filed on December 18, 1961 by the Central Board of Waqfs, UP, through secretary and nine others.
Relief claimed:
- That the disputed site must be declared as a mosque and the area adjoining as a Muslim graveyard.
- That possession be given to the central board of waqfs.
On behalf of deity Lord Ram and Deoki Nandan Agarwal – case filed on July 1, 1989. Deoki Nandan Agarwal is a senior advocate and a retired judge of the Allahabad High Court.
Relief Claimed:
- That the disputed structure belongs to the deity Lord Ram.
- Injunction against the Waqf board preventing them from interfering in the building of the temple.
- Demolishing the existing structure of the Babri Masjid. (This was filed before the demolition of the Babri mosque in 1992)
Security measures:
Across the country, it has been life as usual today, including in Faizabad and Ayodhya, where schools and colleges are also open.
The Centre and the state governments, however, are taking no chances and so security has been tightened in sensitive areas and forces have been mobilised. All political parties and religious groups associated with the dispute have said they will respect the verdict.
There is strict vigil in Faizabad. More than 20,000 securitymen are on alert and there is arrangement for aerial surveys. (Watch: Life in Lucknow, Faizabad normal) I (Mayawati: Centre didn’t give enough forces)
1,90,000 security personnel in Uttar Pradesh
19 places have been identified as “sensitive.”
Maharashtra, Kerala, Karnataka and Madhya Pradesh have been identified as trouble-prone.
Central forces would be 10 minutes away and on call with extensive deployment near sensitive spots.
India Air Force aircraft would be on standby to transport troops to eight places across the country.
Ban on bulk SMSes continues.
No pillion riders and parking not allowed near restricted sites in Delhi, Hyderabad.
The three-Judge bench comprising Justice S U Khan, Justice Sudhir Agarwal and Justice D V Sharma will deliver the verdict at 3.30 pm.
Allahabad High Court has said that the judgement of the case will be available on the official website of the court www.allahabadhighcourt.in and www.rjbm.nic.in.
The court has been turned into a virtually impregnable fortress having been declared as a no access zone.
Additional civil and police officers are being deployed at sensitive places including Allahabad High Court and its Lucknow bench premises.
Administrations in all the districts are directed to ensure that anti-social elements do not disturb law and order situation on the pretext of this sensitive issue.
Security of the three High Court judges had already been tightens. About 20 personnel of PAC and five CRPF personnel have been deployed at residence of all the three judges.
They have been also provided an escort and pilot car and one PSO. A DSP rank officer has been made in charge of the judge’s security.
About 25 districts of the state including Agra, Allahabad, Aligarh, Azamgarh, Bareilly, Beharaich, Bulandsahar, Gonda, Gorakhpur, Kanpur, Meerut, Moradabad, Mau, Varanasi, Faizabad, Mathura, Bijnore, Muzaffarnagar and Lucknow have been identified as sensitive and hyper sensitive and special precautions have taken in these districts.
On Wednesday, Home Minister P. Chidambaram said that the Centre has taken adequate measures and deployed enough security forces all over the country to assist the state governments to maintain peace.
He said that all the state governments have been advised to be firm and expressed the confidence that they will be able to maintain public order and peace.
The Supreme Court had on Tuesday gave its nod to the court’s Lucknow Bench to go ahead with its announcement of the judgment in the case, as it rejected an appeal that sought to defer the Allahabad Court’s verdict on the Ayodhya-Ramjanambhoomi title issue.
New Delhi / Lucknow: Sixty years after it first went to court, there shall be a verdict in the Ayodhya title suit today afternoon. The Lucknow bench of the Allahabad High Court is expected to deliver its verdict after 3 pm.
It has been a protracted legal battle, and people across the country have spoken in one voice on the need to maintain peace and harmony irrespective of the verdict. (Watch – India united for peace: Appeals for calm)
The verdict in the Ram Janambhoomi-Babri Masjid dispute will decide whether the 2.7 acres of disputed land on which the Babri Masjid stood before it was demolished on December 6, 1992, belongs to the Sunni Central Waqf Board or to the Akhil Bharat Hindu Mahasabha.
Tags: Ayodhya verdict, High Court, Judgement, Video, Babri Masjid, Ram Janambhoomi, dispute, 30th september, 2010,Babri Masjid Verdict , Babri Masjid Demolition Video ,Pictures,babri masjid, babri masjid demolition, babri masjid demolition video, babri masjid controversy, babri masjid demolition pictures,ayodhya controversy, ayodhya history, what is ayodhya verdict, ayodhya verdict latest news, ayodhya verdict holiday
